- Why shall it be kept a secret that human giants have existed?
We have for some years now had proof that human giants have
existed, but why is it so hard to learn about this? Why do
the encyclopaedias still tell us that giants only are mythological
fantasies and that gigantism only is a disease? And why do
archaeologists warn me that my research on giants can be dangerous?
of the world's most renowned researchers on ancient human
species, Abesalom Vekua and Lee Berger, are sure that we humans
have been through a period of gigantism. But even if they
can show the fossils of giant bones this is still not accepted
by the majority of the mainstream scientists - and in encyclopaedias
we will read that human giants are just are myths or result
of a disease. Why? Is this supposed to be a secret? Why?
(mythology) The mythology and legends of many different
cultures include monsters of human appearance but prodigious
size and strength. Read
Encyclopædia Britannica: giant, in folklore, huge
mythical being, usually humanlike in form. Read
Gigantism (Wikipedia): Gigantism, also known as giantism,
is a condition characterized by excessive growth and
height significantly above average. In humans, this
condition is caused by over-production of growth hormone
in childhood resulting in persons between 7 feet (84
inches) (2.13 m) and 9 feet (108 inches) (2.72 m) in
Encyclopædia Britannica: gigantism, excessive
growth in stature, well beyond the average for the individual's
heredity and environmental conditions. Tall stature
may result from hereditary, dietary, or other factors.
Gigantism is caused by disease or disorder in those
parts of the endocrine system that regulate growth and
it a go - do as I did; Search Wikipedia and Encyclopædia
Britannica for "giants", "human giants",
"ancient giants", "giant human skeleton(s)",
and "giant human bones" . You will find nothing
but references to mythology.
You will easily find Berger and Vekua
and their findings of very ancient human species in South
Africa and Georgia respectively, on simular searches. But
not a word about them confirming human giants! Why?
Well, it was not so hard for me to
find information on the internet when it comes to the fact
that the two famous professors also have told the world about
giant human bones. I have written articles about this on my
other pages but let me give you a short recap here:
is a renowned paleoanthropologist
and archaeologist from the
of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. He has conducted
numerous expeditions as an explorer for National Geographic
and he is well known for his discovery of Australopithecus
sediba, a human ancestor that lived almost 2 million years
can click on all the pictures on this page for more
|Prof. Berger and
Well, "The Naked Scientists" is an award winning
BBC weekly radio programme. In an interview with Lee Berger
in 2007 he shows the host Dr. Chris Smith a fossilized bone
of an individual that should be over 7 feet tall and says
that they have found a lot of them and everywhere they find
then they are enormous:
- These individuals are extraordinary, they are giants, he
And yes; Professor Berger has confirmed
in an e-mail to me that the interview indeed is real.
When it comes to finding remains
of one of the oldest human ancestors everybody applauds him
but when he is telling that we have been through a period
of gigantism it seem like nobody wants to listen or take a
look at the proof. Why?
Read my article
Abesalom Vekua is a paleontologist and archeologist of the
Academy of Sciences of Georgia and a leading scientific researcher
of the Georgian National Museum.
He is almost as famous as Lee Berger, and as Professor Berger
he has found fossilized bones one of one of the oldest human
ancestors: Homo erectus georgicus, 1.8 million years old.
Channel One, the major broadcasting
company in Russia, had a long news-report showing how a team
of researchers found the giants bones of Borjomi in Georgia.
In an newspaper article Vekuka is
confirming that giant human remains were found: - They are
mentioned as giants in the scientific literature, although
this hypothesis was not confirmed, Vekua said.
I have not been able to get in touch
with Abesalom Vekua but Otar Baghaturia, a senior lecturer
at the Georgian Technical University, was one of the
members of the expedition and he has e-mailed me confirming
that they found bones of giants 2,2-3 meters tall and that
they were hoping to organize another expedition but that the
situation in Georgia is making it difficult.
again: When it comes to finding one of the oldest human ancestors
Vekua is applauded but when he is telling about giants it
seem like nobody wants to listen
take a look at the proof. Why?
is today believed that Homo Heidelbergensis was the ancestor
of Homo sapiens in Africa and the Neanderthals in Europe,
and perhaps also the Denisovans in Asia - and that the species
survived until 200,000 to 250,000 years ago. But most scientists
believe that Homo heidelbergensis averaged about 170 cm (5ft
7in) in height and were slightly taller than Neanderthals.
Well, Lee Berger is finding plenty
fossilized bones of much taller individuals in South Africa
and Abesalom Vekua can show us very large bones from the opposite
side of the globe. Why?
why have their findings not created a stir in the media?
one of my other articles I show some samples of old newspaper
articles telling about giant bones, mostly from the USA. Well,
two other private researchers, Jim Vieira and Micah Ewers,
have now managed to find more than 1500 old newspaper articles
and archaeological/historical reports about the findings of
giant bones! In many of them you can read that the bones were
sent to the Smithsonian institution. And you can in fact read
in old Smithsonian reports about the bones but if you ask
the people at the Smithsonian today then they will tell you
that they cannot find anything; no bones - that nothing is
registered. Why? Is it like some independent researchers say:
That the Smithsonian is covering up? Covering up for what
or who - and why?
12th Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the
Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1890-1891:
"Near the original surface, 10 or 12 feet from
the center, on the lower side, lying at full length
on its back, was one of the largest skeletons discovered
by the Bureau agents, the length as proved by actual
measurement being between 7 and 8 feet." .
Read my article
it be it was like it was with Thor Heyerdahl of the Kon-Tiki
fame? All the mainstream scientists strongly refuted the Norwegian's
theory in 1941 that that people from South America could have
sailed to the Polynesian islands in pre-historical times.
say something about the future you must know
the past", Heyerdahl
Heyerdahl was very afraid of the
sea as a young man but he found it necessary to prove to the
scientists that primitive vessels could have crossed the Pacific;
by sailing the balsa raft Kon-Tiki from Peru to the Tuamotu
islands in 1947.
In 1952 Heyerdahl published a book:
"American Indians in the Pacific; The Theory behind the
Kon Tiki Expedition". The book had over 800 pages of
single-spaced print and over a thousand scholarly references,
and it spelled out his ideas in detail. But most established
scientists still laughed at Heyerdahl - without looking at
the elaborate research he had done!
Even today it seems that very few
want to accept that Thor Heyerdahl was right - but he was:
DNA testing of people, chicken and sweet-potatoes has shown
that there must have been early connection between South America
Never mentioned giants
Most people have heard about Thor Heyerdahl and his Kon-Tiki
expedition but not many, not even in Norway, are aware that
Heyerdahl first of all was a scientist and that he lead archaeological
expeditions all over the world up til he died in 2002. His
main goal was to research on our cultural origins and he always
had a team of well-respected archaeologists with him on his
Heyerdahl never mentioned giants,
and I guess that was wise; it was a very complicated puzzle
he was trying to put together and to bring in giants would
have made people believe that he totally had lost his wits.
Especially in a country where giants just were trolls of the
fairytales! But we know that Thor Heyerdahl everywhere came
across legends of white skinned and blond giants that often
were called Gods - he followed them all the way from the Pacific
islands to the Caucasus Mountains!
Heyerdahl said that to be able to
say something about the future you must know the past, and
he was very afraid that our future is threatened by our use
of fossil fuels: He saw dangerous climate change all over
the world. He worked non-stop to find answers but today hardly
anybody but me, at least not in Norway, seems to follow up
his important work to find the truth of our cultural origins.
Heyerdahl's "The Bearded Gods Speak" (1971)
was when I did some research to write an article about the
ancient statues on the Pacific islands that I discovered that
many of them had six fingers. To my surprise I also found
that so did many ancient statues all over the world! Most
often they depicted local Gods that also were very tall -
what we call giants. To learn more I made two websites under
my Sydhav-domain: "Six Fingers" and "Giants".
It did not take long before I met the same attitude as Thor
Heyerdahl: "We do not want to believe you no matter what
you say or prove". '
Read my Six Fingers web-pages
most people do not want to take me seriously when I tell them
that my private research is about a race of tall humans. It
does not help to mention the findings of Berger and Vekua:
They just do not want to hear about it. "Giants belong
to fairytales and mythology", is what they say - and
just shakes their heads when I tell them they can see the
bones of the giants with their own eyes.
can in one way understand that people do not want to believe
that giants have existed and do not want to look at the proof
- and I have accepted that I can be ridiculed but do I have
to be afraid as well? I have received warnings that my research
can be dangerous. From several people, all over the world;
among them a well respected Norwegian archaeologist (that
I cannot name) and artifact researcher Klaus Dona from Austria.
But nobody wants to tell me why my research can be dangerous.
Well, it is not only Thor Heyerdahl
and me who has been discredited for researching history that
is not according to what the mainstream believes about our
past. And it is not only me that learn that such research
can be dangerous. Let me just take two samples: One from Mexico
and one from Greece. They do not, as far as I know, involve
giants but show the dangers of studying the human race:
Hueyatlaco is an archeological site in the Valsequillo Basin
near the city of Puebla in Mexico. After excavations in the
1960s, the site became notorious due to geochronologists'
analyses that indicated human habitation at Hueyatlaco was
dated to ca. 250,000 years before the present. The scientific
consensus for habitation of the New World is 13,000 to 16,000
years before present. The site was discovered by Juan Armenta
Camacho and Cynthia Irwin-Williams, and later further work
was done by Virginia Steen-McIntyre. When the findings were
dated to be incredible old, the research teams were harassed
and viewed as incompetent - and the researches saw their careers
hampered. Steen-McIntyre was refused permission to further
research and eventually the site was claimed prohibited for
excavations by the authorities. Even today it seems that we
are not supposed to hear about the Valsequillo artefacts (including
an engraved "green" mastodon bone!) and the old
date - even if peer-reviewed analyses has confirmed the earlier
findings of ca. 250,000 - the latest in 2006.
The Petralona cave is located in about 35 km southeast of
Thessaloniki and on the west side of Mount Katsika in Greece.
In 1959 a shepherd came across a small opening to a cave and
a human skull embedded in the wall was found (later research
also uncovered a huge number of fossils including pre-human
species, animal hair, fossilized wood, and stone and bone
Dr Aris Poulianos, an expert anthropologist,
found the "Petralona man" to be 700,000 years
making it the oldest human europeoid (presenting European
in Europe. His research showed that the Petralona man evolved
separately in Europe and was not an ancestor of a species
that came out of Africa. This created problems.
German researchers tried to dismiss Dr Poulianos' findings,
arguing that the skull was only 50,000 years old and was indeed
an ancestor that came from Africa. However,
research published in the US in 1971 in the prestigious Archaeology
magazine, backed up the findings that the skull was indeed
700,000 years old. Dr Poulianos was stopped from
further work in the cave without any explanation and he and
his wife were physically attacked and injured in their home.
He was also verbally abused when attempting to give an invited
presentation to teachers and school children.
So there seems to be some uncertainty about our distant past
- and that this seems to cause some problems for the people
researching our origins.
Archaeology" is a 1993-book by Michael A. Cremo and Richard
L. Thompson. Cremo is claiming that the book has "over
900 pages of well-documented evidence suggesting that modern
man did not evolve from ape man, but instead has co-existed
with apes for millions of years!". He also writes that
the scientific establishment has suppressed the fossil evidence
of extreme human antiquity.
I guess that the mainstream archaeologists
are having a good sarcastically laugh of Cremo's claims, most
probably without reading the book and take a look at the evidence
he is presenting, but should they behave like this? Is not
science about of pursuing knowledge, not only the knowledge
The so called "Ica stones" is a collection of andesite
stones with depictions of dinosaurs and what supposedly is
illustrating advanced technology. The mainstream scientists
claim that the Ica-stones are fake and the main argument is
of course that humans did not co-exist with dinosaurs. A doctor
named Javier Cabrera Darquea collected the stones from the
1960s and he obtained many of them from a farmer named Basilio
Uschuya. Uschuya admitted at one stage to creating the carvings
he had sold but later recanted this, saying that he had claimed
they were a hoax to avoid imprisonment for selling archaeological
In July of 1944 a man named Waldemar Julsrud (said to be a
German, but the family-name is Norwegian) came upon some artefacts
near Acambaro, Guanajuato in Mexico: the so-called "Acambaro
Figurines". These small figurines depicted all types
of creatures but many of them were dinosaurs. A local farmer
helped him to find more and they found 32.000 of them! Among
the figurines were also images of Egyptians and Sumerians.
Most scientists believe that the Acambaro figurines are not
genuine, and one of the reasons are the huge number of figurines
found. Another argument is, of course, that no humans have
ever seen a dinosaur; they died out long before homo sapiens
came to existence. Well, thermoluminescence testing has shown
that the figurines are about 4500 years old. The question
is then: How could somebody make a figurine depicting a dinosaur,
when fossil records of dinosaurs did not exist?
On the walls of the Ta Prohm temple near Angkor Wat in Cambodia
there are hundreds of carvings of familiar animals like deer,
parrots, monkeys and water buffaloes. But one of the carvings
seems to be of a Stegosaurus dinosaur! Again; the main stream
scientists say that this is a hoax or that the depiction does
not show a dinosaur. But research has shown that the carved
figure is old - and it definitely looks like a Stegosaurus!
Much older homo species
if the Ica-stones, Acambaro figurines and the Cambodian temple
dinosaurs in fact are real artefacts and not hoaxes? What
if the Hueyatlaco and Petralona findings are dated correct?
What if we homo sapiens sapiens are much older than 200.000
years, when it is believed that the first modern man evolved
in Africa? Or what if we have had other and much older homo
species on Earth able of making depictions of dinosaurs?
Can it be that what we have learned
about our origins is very wrong?
has started to change a lot - so has new findings. New
theories about the first human species are presented all the
time. We learn about new species of homo that seems to have
lived together with, and interbred with, our own strain. One
of them were the Denisova hominins. Even if we still do not
know how they looked and how tall they were; it is a fact
that the tooth found in the Denisova cave is the largest homo
molar ever found. It was in fact so big that the archaeologists
first believed it was a tooth of an extinct cave bear!
How long we humans have existed on earth as homo sapiens sapiens
is of course an interesting question but I believe that might
be even more interesting to figure out what happened to the
other homo species. The Denisovans
had a very advanced technology for the time and it now also
seems that Neanderthals had much more knowledge than us homo
sapiens sapiens. It might very well be that
were the dumbest in the class!
many small and one large drill-hole
the interbreeding with us make the other species extinct?
Lee Berger says that there has been
found a lot of fossilized bones of giants in South Africa
but that we are talking about 300.000 years ago. What if they
did not slowly die out as is believed (might be because of
the lust of our own species); what if they lived on Earth
for thousands and thousands of years?
There are lot of samples of advanced
technology from a distant past all over the globe: Ancient
buildings, wall, structures and smaller objects that should
have been impossible to make with the tool and knowledge that
the humans were supposed to have at the time: Pyramids and
temples with huge blocks of stone positioned so finely together
that you can not push a piece of paper in between them. Statues,
and obelisks, even menhirs, so large and heavy that it should
have been impossible to move and raise them. Dolmen with enormous
boulders placed on top of standing stones.
But craftsmen of today might be even
more in awe over some of the smaller objects, like the jars
in the museum in Cairo: Made of basalt or granite they are
fully hollowed with narrow openings, and some even have long
necks. To produce such a jar in clay would be very impressive
- in granite or basalt it is incredible. Yes, it is safe to
say that the techniques used to produce these jars has yet
to be replicated!
There are holes drilled in pyramids
and temples at Giza, and not only are the holes drilled to
perfection in granite and basalt but some of the holes have
even been enlarged in ancient times using a core drill! A
core drill bit is usually made of a hollow steel tube, and
for drilling in basalt or granite the end of the steel ring
is studded with industry diamonds. To try to drill in such
hard rock without such a modern tool would be an exercise
in futility! And the ancient Egyptians were supposed to have
used soft copper tools, stone and sand! You will find the
same incredible drilling in very hard stone done in ancient
times other places - like in the ruins of Puma Punka in South
A race of giants
So who were behind the advanced technology all over the world
in ancient times? Who managed to move gigantic stones from
far away and placed with incredible precision in megalithic
structures, who made delicate jars of granite and drilled
tiny holes in basalt; feats that it would be hard to replicate
today? The mainstream archaeologists say it was the forefathers
of the people living on these places today. Well,
when the first explorers asked the natives, they just shrugged
their shoulders and said that they did not know. It was done
in a very distant past - of a race of giants that lived before
and legends all over the world tell that giants have lived
on our planet. Yes this was also the common belief among the
scientists before Charles Darwin in 1859 presented his theory
saying that natural selection was the cause of evolution:
Humans had evolved from apes. The giants of the Bible were
suddenly nothing but theology, and the legends all over world
just fiction. Well; there is still a fierce debate between
the creationists and evolutionists - and archaeological findings
and DNA-testing is bringing questions to the accepted theory
of human evolution.
Four cycles of creation and destruction
Let us take a brief look at the ancient people of Mexico,
like the Aztec; they believed that the present world was preceded
of four cycles of creation and destruction. In the first cycle,
first "Sun", the people were giants. They were also
gods, and rivalry made one of them knock the sun out of the
sky so the world became totally black, and all the people
were eaten by jaguars. At the start of the second period the
gods created a new group of people, this time they were of
normal size. But they grew less and less civilized and stopped
honouring the gods. One god then turned the people into monkeys,
and sent a mighty hurricane that blew them from the face of
the Earth. New people was created but in this period a great
drought swept the world. The people's prayers for rain annoyed
the god that had created them and in a fit of rage he sent
a great downpour of fire, and it continued to rain fire until
the entire Earth had burned away. The gods had to make a new
Earth from the ashes but it did not go better this time either;
the wife of one of the gods sent a horrific flood that drowned
everyone on Earth. One of the gods who would not accept the
destruction of the people went to the underworld where he
stole their bones from another god and he then dipped these
bones in his own blood to resurrect the people to the current
will find simular legends telling about different periods
for the human race many places in the world and often the
people are eradicated to almost the last man. Very common
is that one of the periods was ended by a world wide flood
because the people made the gods angry; most famous is of
course the story of Noah from the Christian bible.
or solar outbursts?
- after floods?
wall, Cusco, Peru
- here Malta
So what are the chances that the people of the Earth have
gone under to almost the last man one or several times? Well,
several researchers and scientists now seem to agree that
we have had gigantic catastrophes in the past. And that comets
hitting the our planet being the culprits. There is physical
evidence for an impact around 10,900 BC, and also 7600, 4400,
3150, 2345, 1628, 1159 and 207 BC - and also 536 and 11768
CE. Several of these dates correspond well with the legends
But there also might be other explanations
to the catastrophes. Robert M Schoch, famous for dating the
Great Sphinx to a much older date than previously believed,
is now researching if solar activity could have played an
important part; If extra strong solar activity, like under
a solar maximum where the sun's magnetic fields/poles are
changing positions, might have sent gigantic solar storms
our way in a distant past. Yes, he asks if solar outburst
could have created powerful plasma phenomena that caused strong
electrical discharges that hit Earth, burning and incinerating
materials on our planets surface, melting glaciers and cause
water to evaporate and then precipitate as torrential rain.
That the melting of ice sheets kilometres thick would release
pressure on the crust and cause catastrophic earthquakes and
volcanic activity around the globe.
Schoch says that the best way to escape
the massive solar busts would be to go underground - and he
asks if the ancient underground cites around the world (like
Cappadicia in Turkey), many of them little researched, were
shelters from solar storm.
Well, then we also can ask if many
of the ancient megalithic wall and buildings were built of
the same reason; to protect against major catastrophes. Like
tsunamis, earthquakes - and even solar storms! Is this the
reason that the walls like those in Peru were built with interlocking
stones to be earthquake proof? And are gigantic stones made
in a kind of "pillow" shape to have groves where
to place waterproofing material (like a kind of putty)?
Did the surviving "gods"
with the help of the people rebuilt the megalithic walls and
buildings after the catastrophe, and tried to make new ones
with varying results, to be prepared for the next time?
We can read, as earlier explained, in archaeological documents
that bones of very large humans were found in many of the
so called Indian mounds of North America. In what obviously
were the oldest mounds the skeletons crumbled to dust but
in some of the "crypts" inside the mounds they found
skeletons sitting upright on benches around a fireplace. With
food on the table.
It is hard to believe that this was
an old, Indian ritual. Is it not more natural to ask if they
were trying to survive a catastrophe? That they were buried
alive in a desperate hope of surviving? We find the same believe
many places in the world; that people were buried with food,
servants, horses and other goods to have a good time in afterlife.
But is this the correct explanation?
Why did the pharaoh Djoser, by the
hjelp of the long-skulled vizier Imhotep, in addition to the
Step Pyramid at Saqqara also make several large stone-buildings
to store massive amounts of seeds like wheat, barley, grape,
tomato and figs? 40.000 storage vessels have been found so
far. Would he need such a large amount of seeds in a theological
heaven? And the "boat pits" at the Giza complex,
would a pharaoh need a fully working boat to row to heaven
- or did he prepare for another devasting flood?
Out of nowhere
Is it not strange that civilisation on Earth according to
the books developed so fast? It is almost like fantastic buildings
appeared almost out of nowhere. How and why did people that
were gatherers and hunters suddenly start to build in massive
stone? Did they not have more than enough to learn how to
do their agriculture? If building in stone was an important
part of civilisation - why is nobody doing it today? The logical
answer is that it was not the local people that built the
pyramids, temples and walls: They explained to the explorers
that it was the gods that have built the fantastic structures
- gods that also were giants. Often they were survivors after
a gigantic catastrophe.
another interesting factor that the scientific world seems
to "forget" is that many ancient buildings of stone
were built on top of even older structures - or remade with
from older structures! Why?
All over the world it lookes like what we call civilization
started around 3000 BC, with impressive buildings made of
stone. Well, that is what the scientist said a few years ago.
Now the ruins of Göbekli Tepe in Turkey have forced the
scientists to accept an earlier date of about 10.000 - or
even 12.000 BC. But why was Göbekli Tepe buried after
completion - and why did statues found there look like ancient
statues on Easter Island, with no legs and hands on the stomac?
What's next - what other mysteries will we not hear about?
do we not learn about the fact that giants have existed? Why
are there so many unanswered questions
about our distant past? Why are private researchers like me
been told that the research can be dangerous?
we not supposed to know the truth?
eyes of that extinct species of giant, whose bones
fill the mounds of America, have gazed on Niagara
as our eyes do now. Abraham Lincoln
Yes, it is a big job to change the
history books all over the world - to rewrite and reprint
them. But we need get it correct, we cannot just accept that
what we have learned is wrong? Is it just a practical problem
that stops us from learning the truth about our earliest history?
Or shall we not hear about giants
because of Darwin's theory of evolution? Why not? Might be
we just need to upgrade it? Let creationists and evolutionists
do the job, make them work together with open minds and study
the latest research. Our past might be different to what both
parties have believed but so what? Well, it might be hard
to accept and understand that the gods that walked together
with people on Earth might have been tall, blond giants but
somebody or something must have created them as well - or?
Some say that the gods came from outer
space to create us but I believe that we do not need to leave
Earth to find the answers. To look for aliens will only create
more problems - for who created them, if they are out there?
Or is the major problem that it might
not have been us humans, homo sapiens sapiens, that built
all the impressive megalithic structures that we find all
around the world. Might be it was another race of humans,
That might be hard to swallow for
But we need to know the truth about
past to say something about our future - and we need the answers
more than ever! Agree?
do you think?
have the following comments on your article Why
shall it be kept a secret that human giants have existed.":
are the ideas, thoughts and facts our readers have sent in:
were giants on the Earth, men...created but evil was
present. Some giants fought evil as good men do. God
has a remmnant few who flee evil at these bad times...but
evil is present in the world for now and evil will succomb
to the everlasting Father in his good time...like a
Father to his own creation. A remnant few will survive
and live forever. The past is hidden from man until
the future when the Father will reveal all.
Hi, I forgot to say also that
in my opinion those giants are not only from the Bigfoot
family sighting around the US but that they could have
been planted here from aliens visiting this earth thousand
of years ago. Or even today.
also believe that it is possible that they may also
be able to read minds and body language and possibly
watch the Bigfoot hunters as these Bigfoot hunters build
elaborate ways to capture them and that they could be
avoiding their traps. It drives me nuts when I watch
those Bigfoot hunters on TV when the hunters describe
what kind of trap they are building and how it works,
they also talk so loud that they draw attention to themselves
which the creatures (Bigfoot) now knows they are up
to something and then they avoid there traps...
may be harry and scary but they did not get this far
by not having some smarts. Maybe more then the trappers
who try to capture them...its like animals they can
smell and hear prey miles off. Or they could be part
human hybrids sent here from the Aliens who visit this
planet. You may have heard this opinion before or thought
it yourself, I'm sure. But thanks for letting me share
with you my thoughts. Its always nice to think out of
the box and to be able to share it with some one.
Oh, I will read on, the articles
a fabulous...What a discovery to make or be a part of...
Have a great day, Carol
The rich and powerful suppress
this knowledge to keep us in the dark as to when the
next round of catastrophes might strike. Its population
control. The megalithic calendars were probably used
to figure out when the catastrophes would strike next
more than when to plant your crops
The "institution", the
powers-that-be; do not want to hear (or anyone else
to hear) anything which would disrupt / disprove the
already shaky theory of macro evolution. It is presented
as fact in the education sector and that's how they
want it to stay, but why? well, the answer is simple,
because they want to disprove any idea or possibility
of a creator. This is the truth and the heart of the
matter. Science, per se has very little to do with it,
you have 2 sides who wish to keep history under control
for very different reasons. Firstly, one side does not
want to accept that there is a creator God, because
with that belief comes accountability and their level
of self-indulgent pride cannot allow that. Secondly,
maybe a little harder to believe, especially for people
who fit into the first category is that the Luciferian
controlled media definitely don't want that kind of
information getting out for obvious reasons.
What I don't understand is
that it seems that a lot of "indian" burial
mounds contain these giants, in the Americas. Couldn't
we settle this just by finding a burial mound and digging
it up? And the smithsonian thing is also interesting;
it seems they have been sent many examples of these
large people, yet they claim nothing. Why would they
Come on with your