I have received warnings that my research can be dangerous!
Dangerous research:
- Why shall it be kept a secret that human giants have existed?
Terje Dahl and picture of the Lovelock-skulls
Terje and the Lovelock-skulls

We have for some years now had proof that human giants have existed, but why is it so hard to learn about this? Why do the encyclopaedias still tell us that giants only are mythological fantasies and that gigantism only is a disease? And why do archaeologists warn me that my research on giants can be dangerous?

Two of the world's most renowned researchers on ancient human species, Abesalom Vekua and Lee Berger, are sure that we humans have been through a period of gigantism. But even if they can show the fossils of giant bones this is still not accepted by the majority of the mainstream scientists - and in encyclopaedias we will read that human giants are just are myths or result of a disease. Why? Is this supposed to be a secret? Why?
Wikipedia: Giant (mythology) The mythology and legends of many different cultures include monsters of human appearance but prodigious size and strength. Read
Encyclopædia Britannica: giant, in folklore, huge mythical being, usually humanlike in form.
Gigantism (Wikipedia): Gigantism, also known as giantism, is a condition characterized by excessive growth and height significantly above average. In humans, this condition is caused by over-production of growth hormone[1] in childhood resulting in persons between 7 feet (84 inches) (2.13 m) and 9 feet (108 inches) (2.72 m) in height.
Encyclopædia Britannica: gigantism, excessive growth in stature, well beyond the average for the individual's heredity and environmental conditions. Tall stature may result from hereditary, dietary, or other factors. Gigantism is caused by disease or disorder in those parts of the endocrine system that regulate growth and development.
Give it a go - do as I did; Search Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica for "giants", "human giants", "ancient giants", "giant human skeleton(s)", and "giant human bones" . You will find nothing but references to mythology.
    You will easily find Berger and Vekua and their findings of very ancient human species in South Africa and Georgia respectively, on simular searches. But not a word about them confirming human giants! Why?
    Well, it was not so hard for me to find information on the internet when it comes to the fact that the two famous professors also have told the world about giant human bones. I have written articles about this on my other pages but let me give you a short recap here:
Renowned paleoanthropologist
Professor Lee Berger is a renowned paleoanthropologist and archaeologist from the
You can click on all the pictures on this page for more information
Professor Lee Berger and Dr. Chris Smith
Prof. Berger and Dr. Smith
Professor Lee Berger Berger showing giant bone.
Berger showing bone
Vekua finding Homo erectus georgicus
Vekua and team
Vekua on Russian news
Vekua on Russian news
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. He has conducted numerous expeditions as an explorer for National Geographic and he is well known for his discovery of Australopithecus sediba, a human ancestor that lived almost 2 million years ago.
Well, "The Naked Scientists" is an award winning BBC weekly radio programme. In an interview with Lee Berger in 2007 he shows the host Dr. Chris Smith a fossilized bone of an individual that should be over 7 feet tall and says that they have found a lot of them and everywhere they find then they are enormous: - These individuals are extraordinary, they are giants, he says.  
    And yes; Professor Berger has confirmed in an e-mail to me that the interview indeed is real.

      When it comes to finding remains of one of the oldest human ancestors everybody applauds him but when he is telling that we have been through a period of gigantism it seem like nobody wants to listen or take a look at the proof. Why?   

Read my article

Leading scientific researcher
Professor Abesalom Vekua is a paleontologist and archeologist of the Academy of Sciences of Georgia and a leading scientific researcher of the Georgian National Museum. He is almost as famous as Lee Berger, and as Professor Berger he has found fossilized bones one of one of the oldest human ancestors: Homo erectus georgicus, 1.8 million years old.
     Channel One, the major broadcasting company in Russia, had a long news-report showing how a team of researchers found the giants bones of Borjomi in Georgia.
    In an newspaper article Vekuka is confirming that giant human remains were found: - They are mentioned as giants in the scientific literature, although this hypothesis was not confirmed, Vekua said.
    I have not been able to get in touch with Abesalom Vekua but Otar Baghaturia, a senior lecturer at the Georgian Technical University, was one of the members of the expedition and he has e-mailed me confirming that they found bones of giants 2,2-3 meters tall and that they were hoping to organize another expedition but that the situation in Georgia is making it difficult.
    So again: When it comes to finding one of the oldest human ancestors Vekua is applauded but when he is telling about giants it seem like nobody wants to listen
Homo Heidelbergensis
Homo Heidelbergensis
or take a look at the proof. Why?
Read my article
    It is today believed that Homo Heidelbergensis was the ancestor of Homo sapiens in Africa and the Neanderthals in Europe, and perhaps also the Denisovans in Asia - and that the species survived until 200,000 to 250,000 years ago. But most scientists believe that Homo heidelbergensis averaged about 170 cm (5ft 7in) in height and were slightly taller than Neanderthals.     Well, Lee Berger is finding plenty fossilized bones of much taller individuals in South Africa and Abesalom Vekua can show us very large bones from the opposite side of the globe. Why?
And why have their findings not created a stir in the media?
Newspapers and reports
From 12th Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1890-1891:
"Near the original surface, 10 or 12 feet from the center, on the lower side, lying at full length on its back, was one of the largest skeletons discovered by the Bureau agents, the length as proved by actual measurement being between 7 and 8 feet."
In one of my other articles I show some samples of old newspaper articles telling about giant bones, mostly from the USA. Well, two other private researchers, Jim Vieira and Micah Ewers, have now managed to find more than 1500 old newspaper articles and archaeological/historical reports about the findings of giant bones! In many of them you can read that the bones were sent to the Smithsonian institution. And you can in fact read in old Smithsonian reports about the bones but if you ask the people at the Smithsonian today then they will tell you that they cannot find anything; no bones - that nothing is registered. Why? Is it like some independent researchers say: That the Smithsonian is covering up? Covering up for what or who - and why?
Read my article

Thor Heyerdahl
Thor Heyerdahl
"To say something about the future you must know the past", Heyerdahl
Research that support Heyerdahl's theories:
Early Americans helped colonise Easter Island
DNA Study reveals connection between Brazil and Polynesia
Radiocarbon and DNA evidence for a pre-Columbian introduction of Polynesian chickens to Chile
DNA shows how the sweet potato crossed the sea
Mummy Forensics: The Screamer
Viking Noble Woman from Black Sea Immigrant Family
Can it be it was like it was with Thor Heyerdahl of the Kon-Tiki fame? All the mainstream scientists strongly refuted the Norwegian's theory in 1941 that that people from South America could have sailed to the Polynesian islands in pre-historical times.
     Heyerdahl was very afraid of the sea as a young man but he found it necessary to prove to the scientists that primitive vessels could have crossed the Pacific; by sailing the balsa raft Kon-Tiki from Peru to the Tuamotu islands in 1947.
     In 1952 Heyerdahl published a book: "American Indians in the Pacific; The Theory behind the Kon Tiki Expedition". The book had over 800 pages of single-spaced print and over a thousand scholarly references, and it spelled out his ideas in detail. But most established scientists still laughed at Heyerdahl - without looking at the elaborate research he had done!
    Even today it seems that very few want to accept that Thor Heyerdahl was right - but he was: DNA testing of people, chicken and sweet-potatoes has shown that there must have been early connection between South America and Polynesia!
Never mentioned giants
Most people have heard about Thor Heyerdahl and his Kon-Tiki expedition but not many, not even in Norway, are aware that Heyerdahl first of all was a scientist and that he lead archaeological expeditions all over the world up til he died in 2002. His main goal was to research on our cultural origins and he always had a team of well-respected archaeologists with him on his expeditions.
    Heyerdahl never mentioned giants, and I guess that was wise; it was a very complicated puzzle he was trying to put together and to bring in giants would have made people believe that he totally had lost his wits. Especially in a country where giants just were trolls of the fairytales! But we know that Thor Heyerdahl everywhere came across legends of white skinned and blond giants that often were called Gods - he followed them all the way from the Pacific islands to the Caucasus Mountains!
     Heyerdahl said that to be able to say something about the future you must know the past, and he was very afraid that our future is threatened by our use of fossil fuels: He saw dangerous climate change all over the world. He worked non-stop to find answers but today hardly anybody but me, at least not in Norway, seems to follow up his important work to find the truth of our cultural origins. Why?
Read Heyerdahl's "The Bearded Gods Speak" (1971)
Statue from Tahiti
Statue from Tahiti
Six fingers
It was when I did some research to write an article about the ancient statues on the Pacific islands that I discovered that many of them had six fingers. To my surprise I also found that so did many ancient statues all over the world! Most often they depicted local Gods that also were very tall - what we call giants. To learn more I made two websites under my Sydhav-domain: "Six Fingers" and "Giants". It did not take long before I met the same attitude as Thor Heyerdahl: "We do not want to believe you no matter what you say or prove". '
Read my Six Fingers web-pages

Yes, most people do not want to take me seriously when I tell them that my private research is about a race of tall humans. It does not help to mention the findings of Berger and Vekua: They just do not want to hear about it. "Giants belong to fairytales and mythology", is what they say - and just shakes their heads when I tell them they can see the bones of the giants with their own eyes.
Terje Dahl and picture of the Lovelock-skulls
Terje at work
I can in one way understand that people do not want to believe that giants have existed and do not want to look at the proof - and I have accepted that I can be ridiculed but do I have to be afraid as well? I have received warnings that my research can be dangerous. From several people, all over the world; among them a well respected Norwegian archaeologist (that I cannot name) and artifact researcher Klaus Dona from Austria. But nobody wants to tell me why my research can be dangerous. Why?
     Well, it is not only Thor Heyerdahl and me who has been discredited for researching history th
at is not according to what the mainstream believes about our past. And it is not only me that learn that such research can be dangerous. Let me just take two samples: One from Mexico and one from Greece. They do not, as far as I know, involve giants but show the dangers of studying the human race:
Engraved mastodon bone
Engraved mastodon bone
Valsequillo artefacts
Hueyatlaco is an archeological site in the Valsequillo Basin near the city of Puebla in Mexico. After excavations in the 1960s, the site became notorious due to geochronologists' analyses that indicated human habitation at Hueyatlaco was dated to ca. 250,000 years before the present. The scientific consensus for habitation of the New World is 13,000 to 16,000 years before present. The site was discovered by Juan Armenta Camacho and Cynthia Irwin-Williams, and later further work was done by Virginia Steen-McIntyre. When the findings were dated to be incredible old, the research teams were harassed and viewed as incompetent - and the researches saw their careers hampered. Steen-McIntyre was refused permission to further research and eventually the site was claimed prohibited for excavations by the authorities. Even today it seems that we are not supposed to hear about the Valsequillo artefacts (including an engraved "green" mastodon bone!) and the old date - even if peer-reviewed analyses has confirmed the earlier findings of ca. 250,000 - the latest in 2006.
"Petralona man"
"Petralona man"
Petralona cave
The Petralona cave is located in about 35 km southeast of Thessaloniki and on the west side of Mount Katsika in Greece. In 1959 a shepherd came across a small opening to a cave and a human skull embedded in the wall was found (later research also uncovered a huge number of fossils including pre-human species, animal hair, fossilized wood, and stone and bone tools).
     Dr Aris Poulianos, an expert anthropologist, found the "Petralona man" to be 700,000 years
old, making it the oldest human europeoid (presenting European traits)

New Research
Mummy lice found in Peru may give new clues about human migration
Where the 'First Americans European?
Aboriginal Australians: The First Explorers
Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact
Now-Extinct Relative Had Sex with Humans Far and Wide

Atlanteans in America - Paleolithic Cro-Magnons in America
Who Brought The Mayans To Mexico?
Native Americans Hailed From Siberian Highlands, DNA Reveals
Polynesian DNA found in old Native American bones

discovered in Europe. His research showed that the Petralona man evolved separately in Europe and was not an ancestor of a species that came out of Africa. This created problems. German researchers tried to dismiss Dr Poulianos' findings, arguing that the skull was only 50,000 years old and was indeed an ancestor that came from Africa. However, research published in the US in 1971 in the prestigious Archaeology magazine, backed up the findings that the skull was indeed 700,000 years old. Dr Poulianos was stopped from further work in the cave without any explanation and he and his wife were physically attacked and injured in their home. He was also verbally abused when attempting to give an invited presentation to teachers and school children.
Forbidden Archeology     
So there seems to be some uncertainty about our distant past - and that this seems to cause some problems for the people researching our origins.
    "Forbidden Archaeology" is a 1993-book by Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson. Cremo is claiming that the book has "over 900 pages of well-documented evidence suggesting that modern man did not evolve from ape man, but instead has co-existed with apes for millions of years!". He also writes that the scientific establishment has suppressed the fossil evidence of extreme human antiquity.
    I guess that the mainstream archaeologists are having a good sarcastically laugh of Cremo's claims, most probably without reading the book and take a look at the evidence he is presenting, but should they behave like this? Is not science about of pursuing knowledge, not only the knowledge itself?
Ica stone
Ica stone
Acambaro figurines
Acambaro figurines
Ta Prohm dinosaur
Ta Prohm dinosaur
Ica Stones
The so called "Ica stones" is a collection of andesite stones with depictions of dinosaurs and what supposedly is illustrating advanced technology. The mainstream scientists claim that the Ica-stones are fake and the main argument is of course that humans did not co-exist with dinosaurs. A doctor named Javier Cabrera Darquea collected the stones from the 1960s and he obtained many of them from a farmer named Basilio Uschuya. Uschuya admitted at one stage to creating the carvings he had sold but later recanted this, saying that he had claimed they were a hoax to avoid imprisonment for selling archaeological artifacts.
Acambaro Figurines
In July of 1944 a man named Waldemar Julsrud (said to be a German, but the family-name is Norwegian) came upon some artefacts near Acambaro, Guanajuato in Mexico: the so-called "Acambaro Figurines". These small figurines depicted all types of creatures but many of them were dinosaurs. A local farmer helped him to find more and they found 32.000 of them! Among the figurines were also images of Egyptians and Sumerians. Most scientists believe that the Acambaro figurines are not genuine, and one of the reasons are the huge number of figurines found. Another argument is, of course, that no humans have ever seen a dinosaur; they died out long before homo sapiens came to existence. Well, thermoluminescence testing has shown that the figurines are about 4500 years old. The question is then: How could somebody make a figurine depicting a dinosaur, when fossil records of dinosaurs did not exist?
Cambodian temple
On the walls of the Ta Prohm temple near Angkor Wat in Cambodia there are hundreds of carvings of familiar animals like deer, parrots, monkeys and water buffaloes. But one of the carvings seems to be of a Stegosaurus dinosaur! Again; the main stream scientists say that this is a hoax or that the depiction does not show a dinosaur. But research has shown that the carved figure is old - and it definitely looks like a Stegosaurus!

Much older homo species

What if the Ica-stones, Acambaro figurines and the Cambodian temple dinosaurs in fact are real artefacts and not hoaxes? What if the Hueyatlaco and Petralona findings are dated correct? What if we homo sapiens sapiens are much older than 200.000 years, when it is believed that the first modern man evolved in Africa? Or what if we have had other and much older homo species on Earth able of making depictions of dinosaurs?
    Can it be that what we have learned about our origins is very wrong?
Denisova tooth
Denisova tooth
Largest homo molar
DNA-testing has started to change a lot - so has new findings.     New theories about the first human species are presented all the time. We learn about new species of homo that seems to have lived together with, and interbred with, our own strain. One of them were the Denisova hominins. Even if we still do not know how they looked and how tall they were; it is a fact that the tooth found in the Denisova cave is the largest homo molar ever found. It was in fact so big that the archaeologists first believed it was a tooth of an extinct cave bear!
Read my article
Advanced technology
How long we humans have existed on earth as homo sapiens sapiens is of course an interesting question but I believe that might be even more interesting to figure out what happened to the other homo species. The Denisovans had a very advanced technology for the time and it now also seems that Neanderthals had much more knowledge than us homo sapiens sapiens. It might very well be that
Sapiens and Neanderthal
Sapiens and Neanderthal
Pyramid temple, Egypt
Pyramid temple, Egypt
Easter Island statues
Easter Island statues
Acambaro figurines
Egyptian Jars
Puma Punka, small and large drill-holes
Puma Punka, many small and one large drill-hole
we were the dumbest in the class!
    Did the interbreeding with us make the other species extinct?
    Lee Berger says that there has been found a lot of fossilized bones of giants in South Africa but that we are talking about 300.000 years ago. What if they did not slowly die out as is believed (might be because of the lust of our own species); what if they lived on Earth for thousands and thousands of years?
     There are lot of samples of advanced technology from a distant past all over the globe: Ancient buildings, wall, structures and smaller objects that should have been impossible to make with the tool and knowledge that the humans were supposed to have at the time: Pyramids and temples with huge blocks of stone positioned so finely together that you can not push a piece of paper in between them. Statues, and obelisks, even menhirs, so large and heavy that it should have been impossible to move and raise them. Dolmen with enormous boulders placed on top of standing stones.
     But craftsmen of today might be even more in awe over some of the smaller objects, like the jars in the museum in Cairo: Made of basalt or granite they are fully hollowed with narrow openings, and some even have long necks. To produce such a jar in clay would be very impressive - in granite or basalt it is incredible. Yes, it is safe to say that the techniques used to produce these jars has yet to be replicated!
    There are holes drilled in pyramids and temples at Giza, and not only are the holes drilled to perfection in granite and basalt but some of the holes have even been enlarged in ancient times using a core drill! A core drill bit is usually made of a hollow steel tube, and for drilling in basalt or granite the end of the steel ring is studded with industry diamonds. To try to drill in such hard rock without such a modern tool would be an exercise in futility! And the ancient Egyptians were supposed to have used soft copper tools, stone and sand! You will find the same incredible drilling in very hard stone done in ancient times other places - like in the ruins of Puma Punka in South America.
Read my article
A race of giants
So who were behind the advanced technology all over the world in ancient times? Who managed to move gigantic stones from far away and placed with incredible precision in megalithic structures, who made delicate jars of granite and drilled tiny holes in basalt; feats that it would be hard to replicate today? The mainstream archaeologists say it was the forefathers of the people living on these places today.
    Well, when the first explorers asked the natives, they just shrugged their shoulders and said that they did not know. It was done in a very distant past - of a race of giants that lived before them.
Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon
Neanderthal, Cro-Magnon
    Myth and legends all over the world tell that giants have lived on our planet. Yes this was also the common belief among the scientists before Charles Darwin in 1859 presented his theory saying that natural selection was the cause of evolution: Humans had evolved from apes. The giants of the Bible were suddenly nothing but theology, and the legends all over world just fiction. Well; there is still a fierce debate between the creationists and evolutionists - and archaeological findings and DNA-testing is bringing questions to the accepted theory of human evolution.
Four cycles of creation and destruction
Let us take a brief look at the ancient people of Mexico, like the Aztec; they believed that the present world was preceded of four cycles of creation and destruction. In the first cycle, first "Sun", the people were giants. They were also gods, and rivalry made one of them knock the sun out of the sky so the world became totally black, and all the people were eaten by jaguars. At the start of the second period the gods created a new group of people, this time they were of normal size. But they grew less and less civilized and stopped honouring the gods. One god then turned the people into monkeys, and sent a mighty hurricane that blew them from the face of the Earth. New people was created but in this period a great drought swept the world. The people's prayers for rain annoyed the god that had created them and in a fit of rage he sent a great downpour of fire, and it continued to rain fire until the entire Earth had burned away. The gods had to make a new Earth from the ashes but it did not go better this time either; the wife of one of the gods sent a horrific flood that drowned everyone on Earth. One of the gods who would not accept the destruction of the people went to the underworld where he stole their bones from another god and he then dipped these bones in his own blood to resurrect the people to the current period.
You will find simular legends telling about different periods for the human race many places in the world and often the people are eradicated to almost the last man. Very common is that one of the periods was ended by a world wide flood because the people made the gods angry; most famous is of course the story of Noah from the Christian bible.
Comets hitting
Comets hitting
Drumlines - after floods?
Drumlins - after floods?
Ancient tsunami
Ancient tsunami
Vitrified wall, Cusco, Peru
Vitrified wall, Cusco, Peru
Underground - here Malta
Underground - here Malta
Machu Picchu
Machu Picchu
Acambaro figurines
Djoser pyramid - and storage houses
Djoser's pyramid
Comets or solar outbursts?
So what are the chances that the people of the Earth have gone under to almost the last man one or several times? Well, several researchers and scientists now seem to agree that we have had gigantic catastrophes in the past. And that comets hitting the our planet being the culprits. There is physical evidence for an impact around 10,900 BC, and also 7600, 4400, 3150, 2345, 1628, 1159 and 207 BC - and also 536 and 11768 CE. Several of these dates correspond well with the legends about catastrophes.
    But there also might be other explanations to the catastrophes. Robert M Schoch, famous for dating the Great Sphinx to a much older date than previously believed, is now researching if solar activity could have played an important part; If extra strong solar activity, like under a solar maximum where the sun's magnetic fields/poles are changing positions, might have sent gigantic solar storms our way in a distant past. Yes, he asks if solar outburst could have created powerful plasma phenomena that caused strong electrical discharges that hit Earth, burning and incinerating materials on our planets surface, melting glaciers and cause water to evaporate and then precipitate as torrential rain. That the melting of ice sheets kilometres thick would release pressure on the crust and cause catastrophic earthquakes and volcanic activity around the globe.
    Schoch says that the best way to escape the massive solar busts would be to go underground - and he asks if the ancient underground cites around the world (like Cappadicia in Turkey), many of them little researched, were shelters from solar storm.
    Well, then we also can ask if many of the ancient megalithic wall and buildings were built of the same reason; to protect against major catastrophes. Like tsunamis, earthquakes - and even solar storms! Is this the reason that the walls like those in Peru were built with interlocking stones to be earthquake proof? And are gigantic stones made in a kind of "pillow" shape to have groves where to place waterproofing material (like a kind of putty)?
    Did the surviving "gods" with the help of the people rebuilt the megalithic walls and buildings after the catastrophe, and tried to make new ones with varying results, to be prepared for the next time?
Indian mounds
We can read, as earlier explained, in archaeological documents that bones of very large humans were found in many of the so called Indian mounds of North America. In what obviously were the oldest mounds the skeletons crumbled to dust but in some of the "crypts" inside the mounds they found skeletons sitting upright on benches around a fireplace. With food on the table.
    It is hard to believe that this was an old, Indian ritual. Is it not more natural to ask if they were trying to survive a catastrophe? That they were buried alive in a desperate hope of surviving? We find the same believe many places in the world; that people were buried with food, servants, horses and other goods to have a good time in afterlife. But is this the correct explanation?
     Why did the pharaoh Djoser, by the hjelp of the long-skulled vizier Imhotep, in addition to the Step Pyramid at Saqqara also make several large stone-buildings to store massive amounts of seeds like wheat, barley, grape, tomato and figs? 40.000 storage vessels have been found so far. Would he need such a large amount of seeds in a theological heaven? And the "boat pits" at the Giza complex, would a pharaoh need a fully working boat to row to heaven - or did he prepare for another devasting flood?
Out of nowhere
Is it not strange that civilisation on Earth according to the books developed so fast? It is almost like fantastic buildings appeared almost out of nowhere. How and why did people that were gatherers and hunters suddenly start to build in massive stone? Did they not have more than enough to learn how to do their agriculture? If building in stone was an important part of civilisation - why is nobody doing it today? The logical answer is that it was not the local people that built the pyramids, temples and walls: They explained to the explorers that it was the gods that have built the fantastic structures - gods that also were giants. Often they were survivors after a gigantic catastrophe.
    Yes, another interesting factor that the scientific world seems to "forget" is that many ancient buildings of stone were built on top of even older structures - or remade with
Göbekli Tepe Easter Island
Göbekli Tepe
Easter Island
elements from older structures! Why?
Göbekli Tepe
All over the world it lookes like what we call civilization started around 3000 BC, with impressive buildings made of stone. Well, that is what the scientist said a few years ago. Now the ruins of Göbekli Tepe in Turkey have forced the scientists to accept an earlier date of about 10.000 - or even 12.000 BC. But why was Göbekli Tepe buried after completion - and why did statues found there look like ancient statues on Easter Island, with no legs and hands on the stomac? What's next - what other mysteries will we not hear about?
Our future
Why do we not learn about the fact that giants have existed? Why are there so many unanswered questions about our distant past? Why are private researchers like me been told that the research can be dangerous?
“The eyes of that extinct species of giant, whose bones fill the mounds of America, have gazed on Niagara as our eyes do now.” Abraham Lincoln
    Are we not supposed to know the truth?
    Yes, it is a big job to change the history books all over the world - to rewrite and reprint them. But we need get it correct, we cannot just accept that what we have learned is wrong? Is it just a practical problem that stops us from learning the truth about our earliest history?
    Or shall we not hear about giants because of Darwin's theory of evolution? Why not? Might be we just need to upgrade it? Let creationists and evolutionists do the job, make them work together with open minds and study the latest research. Our past might be different to what both parties have believed but so what? Well, it might be hard to accept and understand that the gods that walked together with people on Earth might have been tall, blond giants but somebody or something must have created them as well - or?
    Some say that the gods came from outer space to create us but I believe that we do not need to leave Earth to find the answers. To look for aliens will only create more problems - for who created them, if they are out there?
    Or is the major problem that it might not have been us humans, homo sapiens sapiens, that built all the impressive megalithic structures that we find all around the world. Might be it was another race of humans, the giants?
    That might be hard to swallow for somebody.
    But we need to know the truth about past to say something about our future - and we need the answers more than ever! Agree?

Terje Dahl

What do you think?
"I have the following comments on your article Why shall it be kept a secret that human giants have existed.":
  E-mail address:

Here are the ideas, thoughts and facts our readers have sent in:
There were giants on the Earth, men...created but evil was present. Some giants fought evil as good men do. God has a remmnant few who flee evil at these bad times...but evil is present in the world for now and evil will succomb to the everlasting Father in his good time...like a Father to his own creation. A remnant few will survive and live forever. The past is hidden from man until the future when the Father will reveal all.
Hi, I forgot to say also that in my opinion those giants are not only from the Bigfoot family sighting around the US but that they could have been planted here from aliens visiting this earth thousand of years ago. Or even today.
I also believe that it is possible that they may also be able to read minds and body language and possibly watch the Bigfoot hunters as these Bigfoot hunters build elaborate ways to capture them and that they could be avoiding their traps. It drives me nuts when I watch those Bigfoot hunters on TV when the hunters describe what kind of trap they are building and how it works, they also talk so loud that they draw attention to themselves which the creatures (Bigfoot) now knows they are up to something and then they avoid there traps...
They may be harry and scary but they did not get this far by not having some smarts. Maybe more then the trappers who try to capture them...its like animals they can smell and hear prey miles off. Or they could be part human hybrids sent here from the Aliens who visit this planet. You may have heard this opinion before or thought it yourself, I'm sure. But thanks for letting me share with you my thoughts. Its always nice to think out of the box and to be able to share it with some one.
    Oh, I will read on, the articles a fabulous...What a discovery to make or be a part of...
Have a great day, Carol

The rich and powerful suppress this knowledge to keep us in the dark as to when the next round of catastrophes might strike. Its population control. The megalithic calendars were probably used to figure out when the catastrophes would strike next more than when to plant your crops
k young

The "institution", the powers-that-be; do not want to hear (or anyone else to hear) anything which would disrupt / disprove the already shaky theory of macro evolution. It is presented as fact in the education sector and that's how they want it to stay, but why? well, the answer is simple, because they want to disprove any idea or possibility of a creator. This is the truth and the heart of the matter. Science, per se has very little to do with it, you have 2 sides who wish to keep history under control for very different reasons. Firstly, one side does not want to accept that there is a creator God, because with that belief comes accountability and their level of self-indulgent pride cannot allow that. Secondly, maybe a little harder to believe, especially for people who fit into the first category is that the Luciferian controlled media definitely don't want that kind of information getting out for obvious reasons.

What I don't understand is that it seems that a lot of "indian" burial mounds contain these giants, in the Americas. Couldn't we settle this just by finding a burial mound and digging it up? And the smithsonian thing is also interesting; it seems they have been sent many examples of these large people, yet they claim nothing. Why would they do this?

Come on with your thoughts, folks!




Do you have other information?
Please send me an e-mail: